It is as if India is gripped in a frenzy of small-minded parochialism. We seem to be speaking in terms of gross stereotyping of regions, religions and nations in what seems to be an absolute reversal of all our professed ideals. That a position that Shiv Sena has taken has any support at all, let alone the sympathy of many who do not see themselves as raving right wing extremists, is surprising. There does seem to be a return that we are seeing of more primitive passions, as we react with emotion to the slightest provocation, real or imagined in arenas important and trivial. Divisive stances come more naturally to a large section of people and there is little attempt to apply the filter of discrimination. Indeed, India is awash in symbolic issues that seem to take up a lot of our time, energy and angst. It seems extraordinarily easy to offend some group or the other on issues that rarely translate into any material consequences.
Is there another way of reading what is happening today? Is the current surge in the parochial symbolic insult an act of civilization rather than one that recalls more 'primitive' passions? As Freud has said, the day someone threw an insult instead of a rock, civilization was born. Could it be that we are re-enacting the primitive with greater economy, precision and efficiency in that we achieve the same effect but with much lower levels of actual violence? Are we seeing a new idea of bloodless primitivism take shape where symbolic anger replaces physical injury as the preferred mode of negotiating contentious issues?
For all the noise that the current issues generate, there has been remarkably little violence on the ground. In most cases, whatever physical action has happened has been enacted for the benefit of television cameras. There are no rallies, demonstrations, confrontations with the police, summary arrests- there is little that is actually happening on the ground. The number of incidents of communal riots have come down significantly. Otherwise every few months, it was commonplace for one or other of the communally sensitive areas to erupt in violence. Interestingly, as an audience we do not tune into issues where real violence is taking place or where people are actually dying, be it in Naxal-dominated tribal regions of India or places where farmer suicides are taking place. They appear less real because media doesn't cover them and urban audiences do not relate to these issues.
The role of media in the appearance of bloodless primitivism is crucial for it ensures efficient distribution of fear, anxiety and outrage with minimal effort. 24x7 media converts a kernel of an issue into a forest fire with effortless and almost inevitable ease. It specializes in recasting questions in martial terms- everything becomes war on television, be it a studio discussion, a game of cricket or an attack on a pub in one small town in India. This symbolic war makes actual violence redundant in most cases and hence we see much more hate and much less violence.
At the risk of some simplification, the modern obsession with terrorism is part of this larger pattern. The terrorist aims to achieve maximum impact with minimal cost; he seeks to distribute panic as widely as possible with putting as little on the line as he can. The use of random violence staged spectacularly is a particularly efficient device in today's times. Compared to conventional warfare, the cost in terms of human lives is extremely low. In India, for instance deaths on account of terrorism have fallen sharply from the 2001 level of over 5839, to 2226 in 2009, according the South Asia Terrorism Portal database, something that runs counter to the noise that is being generated about the issue today. Compare this with the fatalities in road accidents which amounted to a staggering 114,444 in 2007, for instance and it becomes clear that terrorism, for all the anxiety it generates, does not lead to that many deaths.
That is not to say that parochialism or terrorism is remotely justified or deserves any sympathy but merely to argue that these forces need to be set in a larger context. The ease with which symbolic violence can be widely distributed is creating a surfeit of such issues, but the real damage inflicted is to the ideals modern societies are built on. It as if all the ideals we professed but lacked real belief in are being renegotiated now that we have a relatively easy and cost efficient way of doing so. What we are seeing is not war by another name but a stage performance where issues are being enacted for an audience.
Now it is so much easier for hate to be expressed without putting anything at risk. We can froth, foam , rave and rant without restraint in the alternative universe called media. The internet is full of the vilest form of hate since it gives us the maximum protection from the consequences of our words. We seethe in anonymous rage, and the oxygen of finding others like us fans the flames of hatred and distrust. By lowering the cost of hate, we are expanding the market for it. For that is the latest product in town- risk free hate, at a never before price.
| Bookmark / Share | |
|
|
Google Bookmarks |
| Buzz up! | |
| StumbleUpon | |
| More | |
Related Blog Posts
Related Stories

Networking
itimes | Dating & Chat | Email





Comments:
Sort by: Oldest | Newest | Recommended (31) | Most DiscussedFebruary 21,2010 at 06:15 PM IST
An excellent article. May awaken the media.
Problems of rural, inaccessible areas of India need more media coverage to help reduce sufferings of people working in remote towns and villages.
Agree (26)
Disagree (13)
Recommend (13)
Offensive
(Reply to Sharda Bhargav - The Confiscated Soul)-
lsinha
says:
February 23,2010 at 02:00 PM IST
why do we always have to blurt out inaninities in the comment section?
Agree (8)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 21,2010 at 06:25 PM IST
Touche !
The literate middle class seem to be getting their fix of righteousness by engaging in empty polemics . The underlying danger is that we all go soft on our commitment to being good citizens & continue to accept a slothful corrupt government made by people exactly like us.
Agree (26)
Disagree (13)
Recommend (12)
Offensive
(Reply to SG)-
MB
says:
February 25,2010 at 12:41 PM IST
The reason is Indians are immotionally crippled people. It seems it is condidered as an insult to use brain.
Agree (8)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 21,2010 at 06:37 PM IST
Mr Desai,
Your article is excellent. But there is a problem. It is being delivered to the wrong people in the wrong place.
I suggest you to enlighten young talibans(students)studying in madrassa in India whose young minds are everyday poisioned against non-muslims
This will help lesser people taking up terrorism in india. Let India benefit.
Agree (28)
Disagree (30)
Recommend (14)
Offensive
(Reply to Karuna)-
Love India
says:
February 23,2010 at 06:19 PM IST
Karuna same logic applied on RSS
Agree (8)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
(Reply to Karuna)-
Danish
says:
February 23,2010 at 03:22 PM IST
sorry dear , I want to correct you ,A P J abdul kalam also studied in madrasa when he was young.every muslim went to madarsa to learn Quran ,not every muslim in india is terrorist. so how can you say that madarsa only preach hate for other religion???? Dats y i would like to say here MY NAME IS KHAN AND I M NOT A TERRORIST......
Agree (8)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
(Reply to Karuna)-
Yogendra Ray
says:
February 23,2010 at 05:28 PM IST
Dear Karuna,
Why do you not realize that the Thackerays are worst than the Taliban? We can fight the Taliban as an Indian. But how you will fight the Thackerays? They are diving the country in the name of race, religion ete. etc.
Agree (7)
Disagree (9)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 21,2010 at 07:39 PM IST
hi, santosh I would not say bloodless, the violence is more shall i say freak, the chain reaction manifests the action at destination 2 and bleeding at destination three, maybe we have become bloodless as a soceity.
Agree (16)
Disagree (12)
Recommend (11)
Offensive
February 21,2010 at 10:40 PM IST
Its great to be reading this on the times website...if ever I have seen someone frothing,raving and ranting it is by the "news" presenters of the Times TV channel.Spitting venom at everything Muslim through such tired tangents as "Afganistan" "Taliban" "Pakistan" is now probably boring even its muddled middle class riff raff of an audience.To the rest of us people ,the ranting bespectacled man in a suit is sometimes good for a few laughs.A Donald duck of sorts.Problem is the TV screen probably gets wetter than it does when the captured cobra spits on the camera lens as it does sometimes on the Discovery channel.Talking of hate...the Sena would probably be great for the Times of India if only it could love the North Indian.
Keep it up guys ..the Times is now making a valiant attempt at sounding intellectual.
Agree (31)
Disagree (20)
Recommend (18)
Offensive
February 21,2010 at 11:01 PM IST
Excellent observation, analysis and expression.
Agree (21)
Disagree (14)
Recommend (14)
Offensive
February 22,2010 at 01:51 AM IST
Could not really understand,what the author wish to convey...
Agree (20)
Disagree (20)
Recommend (11)
Offensive
February 22,2010 at 07:01 PM IST
Santosh, brilliant article, not least for your use of words (as usual). Your observations also seem to be spot on in many ways. Love the way you bring your 'marketing man' identity to the article.
Agree (14)
Disagree (12)
Recommend (12)
Offensive
February 22,2010 at 07:28 PM IST
Btw Santosh, are you still with Future Group? Could give you some suggestions as a consumer!!!
Agree (12)
Disagree (11)
Recommend (11)
Offensive
February 23,2010 at 12:05 AM IST
Santosh, thanks for raising this point. I would like to add to list of worries that we need to concentrate, to secure good life for Indian citizens in future. Food security, nutrition, education in rural area, drinking water, sanitation, good roads........i wish one day the pathetic road conditions raise as much sensation as self proffessed intellectuals shouting on media about something they have never felt themselves.
Agree (14)
Disagree (11)
Recommend (12)
Offensive
February 23,2010 at 03:14 AM IST
Mr. Desai,
What about the families of 26/11 ? Don't you think Mr. Khan offended them by saying the Pakistani players should be included in the IPL ?
Even though it is clear that Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) and their ISI handlers were responsible for 26/11, none of the perpertrators have been brought to justice.
Why can't SRK make a public statement demanding justice for these families and that Pakistan hand over Hafiz Saeed, Mr. Zakhi and LeT officials for trial in India.
I saw SRK here in London on BBC and he seamed to want to curry favor with the UK Pakistani population who are big fans.
I am a South Indian who is no fan of Shiv Sena or other groups like them but have great sympathies for innocent Indians who have had to suffer tragedies such as 26/11
Agree (27)
Disagree (17)
Recommend (14)
Offensive
(Reply to Ravi)-
Raj
says:
February 23,2010 at 01:32 PM IST
Ravi,
Though I may disagree with SRK, I believe that he has every right to say what he feels. This is what makes us different from taliban and their patriarch.
It just seems that we have forgotten the very principles on which this nation was founded.
I really hope that good sense prevails and our nation actually becomes a true democracy
Cheers,
Raj
Agree (7)
Disagree (8)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
(Reply to Ravi)-
Danish
says:
February 23,2010 at 03:36 PM IST
What SRK has to do with dis article can some body explain me pls??????????????
Agree (8)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
(Reply to Ravi)-
Raj
says:
February 24,2010 at 04:33 PM IST
Celebrities like SRK and many politicians are all ambassodor of Islam. No use in expecting anything good from them. They are just secular when it comes to their religion else they are near fanatics.
Agree (8)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 23,2010 at 06:10 AM IST
I can't be sure if this non-violent hate is on the rise but I have seen something unique in Indian Psych. Indians, for generations, have pit one founding father against the other: Nehru vs. Patel or Gandhi vs. Bose. Some of that has to do with rooting for the underdog. The so called educated Indians love to hate Nehru and Gandhi, for most irrational reasons. For sure this is non-violent hate. It however undermines the trust of people in their own country, founding fathers and the value system the country was founded on, resulting in demoralization. It further distracts the nation from real enemies and real problems.
Agree (15)
Disagree (16)
Recommend (12)
Offensive
February 23,2010 at 11:31 AM IST
The article is packed with interesting new ideas. That's rare in the Cliché-filled world of journalism today. However, as always, there are counter-facts. Many studies show that verbal violence is a prelude to physical violence. The perpetrators are testing the waters, as it were. Visual media may actually goad people into Goondaism. They may do it consciously or unconsciously. Not that they mind! They are looking at TRPs, and their ticker-tape bottom lines. That is the single issue they care most about!
Agree (12)
Disagree (11)
Recommend (11)
Offensive
February 23,2010 at 12:14 PM IST
Non Violent Hate = Freedom to Think and Believe.
What next, we are going to legislate that everybody love everybody? As long as people do not break the law, everyone is entitled to their own opinions, no matter how much some 'educated intellectuals' would like to indulge in mind control.
Agree (16)
Disagree (14)
Recommend (12)
Offensive
(Reply to Nitin)-
Observer
says:
February 23,2010 at 09:11 PM IST
No, we couldn't do that. Just that hate of any kind is counter productive for the development of society in the long run.
Agree (7)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
(Reply to Nitin)-
Jay
says:
February 24,2010 at 12:49 AM IST
The hate mongering can't be equalled with freedom of speech, thought or belief. The hate mongers don't recognize the right of others to speak, think or believe and label them nonbelievers, chamchas or sycophants.
Agree (7)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 23,2010 at 07:40 PM IST
one of the best articles of recent times . Being a muslim i think something of this type was long warranted . Something which not only could explain growing anti-islamic xenophobia in india but also theorise the growing hate around the globe. brilliantly put up in an essay !
Agree (8)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 23,2010 at 09:18 PM IST
beautifully written.....and a good alternate take on events happening in our country recently
Agree (7)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 23,2010 at 10:30 PM IST
Broader view and well written making the issue more elaborate with naunces and facets.
Agree (7)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 23,2010 at 11:51 PM IST
It is not hate Its just the reality biting your dreaming butt reminding you (especially north indians) that india is not a homogenous hindi speaking entity.
This is the age old fight of "India" of the kangress and the "India" of the Mahabharata. Mahabharata's india will win and that of Kangress will lose.
Agree (7)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 24,2010 at 10:09 AM IST
with all the pseudo intellectual non-sense in the article and the follow up replies heres a brain teaser for you:
if an intellectual speaks in a forrest and no one is around to hear it did he say anything intellectual?
Agree (7)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 24,2010 at 11:38 AM IST
Hi Mr. Santosh ,
I have been reading your articles since almost a year and i must say your writing style is the most non conventionalist but hitting the right note note and right point....carry on your good work...we really need different from league writers like you....
Agree (7)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive
February 25,2010 at 08:02 AM IST
Just like sensible behaviour by mwmbers of a family requires fair treatment of all towards each other particularly by the head/heads of the family, similarly all members of a society have to feel being treated fairly.When pillars of democracy, such as government or media seem to be biased resistance to counter the unfairness grows. Minority politics by governments, biased reporting by the media are major contributors to make the affected people let down and frustrated.Take fort example the case of the pundits. How can the Kashmiri pundits be refugees in their own country?
What has the media done to bring about justice to these Indians? What have the different levels of governments done to resettle them back in their home state? And what have the rest of Indiands done to pressurise the governments to restore their homes and dignity?
Agree (7)
Disagree (7)
Recommend (7)
Offensive