The burden of expectation always accompanies Barack Obama. Today, it was no different when he addressed the Muslim world — under crushing hope that somehow his speech would make everything all right.
Obama’s speech Cairo University was a masterpiece in political oratory. Never has his Muslim roots been put to better use. And what better place to exploit it than in Egypt, home of pan-Arabism as well as home to al-Qaida ideologue, Ayman Zawahiri?
What was most significant about Obama’s speech was not what he said, but how he said it. America will not change its policies, the ground realities in the region and across the Islamic world will not vanish overnight, Israelis and Palestinians will not see the light suddenly. But the speech might just help in changing the mode of discussion in US-Islamic engagement.
For the first time, a US president leveraged US’ close relationship with Israel to publicly rap it on the knuckles on the settlement issue. This will have a big effect on the Arabs who generally believe that American presidents are dictated by the "Jewish lobby" in Washington. Obama has already raised the issue with Netanyahu so it wasn’t a surprise to Israelis, just as he has already rejected Netanyahu’s gambit of tying peace negotiations with Iran’s stopping its nuclear ambitions.
However, Obama emphasized the "bond" with Israel and in a deliberate snub to Iran and other Muslim Arabs who overtly or silently scoff at the holocaust. In fact, Obama’s most substantive diplomacy was with the Saudi King Abdullah, who has been asked to revive his peace plan. And tomorrow he travels to Buchenwald, one of the worst concentration camps in Germany to further emphasise that the horros of the holocaust cannot be trifled with.
His messages to the Muslim world were not new – get democracy, women’s rights, innovation, economic development. Most important, he took a completely different path than George W. Bush to tell Muslims around the world that it was in their interests to reject Islamic extremism.
"The Holy Koran teaches that whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he has killed all mankind; and whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind," Obama told about 3,000 people in Cairo and the Muslim world at large in a major speech Thursday. "Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism -- it is an important part of promoting peace."
Pointing to the 3,000 killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, Obama said al-Qaida "chose to ruthlessly murder these people ... and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale." Obama did not mince words that Muslims had to be partners in combating extremism, it was only said in a way that made it seem non-threatening to the Muslim world. Therein was the real success of the speech.
I thought one of the more significant practical steps was for the US to team up with the OIC to launch an anti-polio campaign in Islamic countries. Administering polio drops to children in Muslim countries (like Nigeria, Pakistan-Afghanistan, even UAE, where it has apparently reappeared) is deemed a problem because of a widespread belief that this is a western conspiracy against Muslims.
On Afghanistan, I think Obama's line that US would leave the country will only serve to strengthen fears that America only wants to "declare" victory and then scram. It will give Pakistan establishment the green signal they are looking for to continue pussyfooting with the Taliban and al-qaida – in anticipation for the day when they can get Afghanistan to themselves again. But in essence, even if Obama did not succeed in wiping out collective mistrust, he sounded so earnest.
Expectedly, the most strident response came from Osama bin Laden, sitting watching Obama on his LCD flat screen in the comfort of Pakistan’s Quetta. If his exhortations proved that he was still alive and well, and in touch with the world, it also proved that he was worried his message might get overtaken by the positive message of Barack Obama.
And here is the real message in fighting Islamic extremism. The “al-Qaida” extremist message is easily and quickly transmitted across the airwaves and the internet, reaching millions of vulnerable minds in different parts of the world. The “other” message, the message of a better future, positive re-engagement, and basically, the real teachings of the Koran, get buried. Today, Obama showed the power of the positive message. And that’s why Osama is unhappy.
The world needs the positive message from every leader of consequence, if we have to win the hearts and minds debate in Islamic extremism.
| Bookmark / Share | |
|
|
Google Bookmarks |
| Buzz up! | |
| StumbleUpon | |
| More | |
Related Blog Posts
Related Stories

Networking
itimes | Dating & Chat | Email





Comments:
Sort by: Oldest | Newest | Recommended (22) | Most DiscussedJune 04,2009 at 10:23 PM IST
A leopard won't change spots.
Agree (38)
Disagree (33)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 04,2009 at 11:54 PM IST
Miss Indrani Please refrain from using the word islamic extremism. Even President Obama did not use such hateful words in his speech. The word Islam pertains to Peace and submission to God. Please do not spread wrong messages by using it in a negative sense and hurting the sentiments
Extremism of any kind is wrong and extremism from people of any faith, color and place is wrong.
Please do not link extremism to a great religion like Islam.
Thank you
Agree (56)
Disagree (47)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 05,2009 at 02:34 AM IST
Barack Hussein Obama did it again. With authority and eloquence he reached out to the Islamic World. The question is whether in 3.5 years what he can achieve. Because already the Israeli lobbby - AIPAC- is gearing its "mighty machines" to defeat him in 2012! Because he has been harsh on them on "The Settlements"!!
Can Obama Magic survive?
Agree (38)
Disagree (32)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 05,2009 at 04:28 AM IST
Hi,
This comment goes to Indrani the author of this blog and also to the management of Times of India.
Indrani inciting communal feelings by utilising words like " Islamic Extremism" I would advice her sincerely not to use such a phrase again in her writing or I would be forced to take legal action against her as well as Times of India for allowing her to use such provocative writings.
We dont call the LTTE, naxalites or the people responsible for temple and mosque demolitinos and killing innocent people in india as "HINDU TERRORIST" and we definitely dont address the threats and problems created by bosnian and chechens as "Christian terrorists"
Or the riots done by sikh pepople and label them as" Sikh terrorists"
Terrorism of any kind is bad and wrong and it doesnt involve the teachings of any religion in the world.
I dont understand why an educated author like Indra is utilising such a decent and great religions name to refer to fanatics and extremists.
A reply in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
I am an Indian and fully excercise my rights and duties as an Indian.
I like reading this newspaper and I appreciate anything that has a secular element in it.
Indras comments are biased and racist towards the muslims.
Please correct and also I hope you do not use such terms in the future
Thanks
Siddiq
Agree (59)
Disagree (43)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 05,2009 at 12:39 PM IST
I think Obama made a very sensitive move. In this world religions dont matter; Islam is not the problem, the misconceptions are. Am happpy that Obama tried to solve root cause in a proper way. You dont need to kill anybody, just manipulate your enemies to create a secure environment. That alone assures a hotseat in White House for the next term.
Agree (30)
Disagree (33)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 05,2009 at 02:04 PM IST
World around we always get to hear Islamic Extremism so the readers have aptly commented that the prefix "Islamic" is kind of hurting to a group.
I agree with the readers and disagree with the author that a religion exists with a very wide following around the world. Dwelling deep into its scriptures we do not see extremism then why do we tend to brand a faith with the ideology pursued by a few mislead individuals of the faith.
Even the President of USA comes up with conciliatory statements for the people of this faith, Why then do our writers & media in general gleefully associate the group with extremism. This attitude on the part of writers, media needs to change it is such statements that estrange even the person(s) who has nothing to do with violence of any kind start rethinking. We should not act as scouts to promote enrollments from any group or faith into such mindless organizations.
Most importantly, we all agree some mislead, misinformed people in every faith can drag the whole faith and all its people into something that has nothing to do with faith nor the group.
We in India have so many who drag us into rioting and violence which is distasteful even to think I being a witness to one such dark event.
Then we should target the individuals and the groups they are associated with rather then targeting the faith they belong to.
Sensible journalism without bias goes a long way in soothing the feelings and embracing people of all faiths to fall into the mainstream.
Agree (38)
Disagree (33)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 05,2009 at 05:10 PM IST
Rev. Asfan Allan. Birmingham U.K. I am a Christian evangelist. Brak Hussein Obama is a member of the Christian Church with evangelical vision, from the same root as one, which I lead as one of the pastors. He is a son of a Muslim father and knows Islamic value and moral teaching that the Islam adheres to. Thus, he would never use word ‘Islamic Extremism’ in his speech. If even by slip of his tongue he did, we should have surely seen global reaction. Egyptian University Al Azhar is the birthplace and seat of Shaffie School of Muslim thoughts and they would not tern blind eyes to such remark. Rather they appreciated his speech as doctrinally fitting to Islam. The Islam is a ‘faith’ that followed by 1.5 billion people on our planet. They are not extremists. Followers of Islam are generous, loveable and respectable people. It would be diabolic and wicked to call them extremists or killers or terrorists. Indrani is callow commentator, lured by her own figment of imagination. She should apologise for such dreaded remark that she made in her article. The Muslims who are followers of Islam have character of long suffering. They have suffered 3248 communal attacks on them in almost all-Indian states. They have faced holocausts of our time in Indian sate of Gujarat. They have suffered state sponsor massacres by military attack on them in Chechania, Bosnia, and Cassava. Under western conspiracy, they are continuously is being wipeout from Israel. Their civil society is destroyed in Iraq and their historical was stolen away. They are suffering from last Forty years a prolong war in Afghanistan. If you still, call them extremists or terrorists then that would be inhuman surely an evil remark.
Agree (40)
Disagree (39)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 06,2009 at 05:10 PM IST
Mr. Asfan, you are white washing the negative face of Islamic faith and the history of spreading Muslim religion in the world. Here are just few examples for you. Learn about Turkish invasion in Bulgaria, They killed all orthodox Christian youths, raped women and converted them to Islam. Kidnapped all kids to Turkey and trained them to become one of the ruthless army in the world and send them back to Bulgaria to kill their own people ( I have the CD of the movie with me about this history with English sub-title). The kids couldn’t even remember their past!! This is applicable in the case of Muslim invasion in India, Innumerable Holocausts, which have been done by Muslims in India to establish Mugal Dynasty. Holocaust in Kashmir against native Hindu Pandits, Malabar holocaust in one of the south Indian States (Kerala) in 1928 carried out against Hindus by Muslims. How many do you need? The Painter M.F.Hussain (Indian) drew the naked picture of Hindu Goddesses to satisfy his old body. There was no “Hafta” ordered against him by Hindus. Hindu Religion has given him full freedom of expression even to rape our faiths. But remember the fate of Salman Rushdi and Thasleema Nasrin, when they expressed their freedom of views.
So, shut up your preaching about peaceful Islam. It is a VICIOUS, WICKED AND VENOMUS FAITH, only suitable for Dark Age and only idiots can be proud of it.
Christian youths, raped women and converted them to Islam. Kidnapped all kids to Turkey and trained them to become one of the ruthless army in the world and send them back to Bulgaria to kill their own people ( I have the CD of the movie with me about this history with English sub-title). The kids couldn’t even remember their past!! This is applicable in the case of Muslim invasion in India, Innumerable Holocausts, which have been done by Muslims in India to establish Mugal Dynasty. Holocaust in Kashmir against native Hindu Pandits, Malabar holocaust in one of the south Indian States (Kerala) in 1928 carried out against Hindus by Muslims. How many do you need? So, shut up your preaching about peaceful Islam. It is a VICIOUS, WICKED AND VENOMUS FAITH, only suitable for Dark Age and only idiots can be proud of it.
Agree (49)
Disagree (45)
Recommend (10)
Offensive
June 06,2009 at 05:19 PM IST
Mr. Asfan, you are white washing the negative face of Islamic faith and the history of spreading Muslim religion in the world. Here are just few examples for you. Learn about Turkish invasion in Bulgaria, They killed all orthodox Christian youths, raped women and converted them to Islam. Kidnapped all kids to Turkey and trained them to become one of the ruthless army in the world and send them back to Bulgaria to kill their own people The kids couldn’t even remember their past!!
Agree (43)
Disagree (44)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 06,2009 at 05:22 PM IST
The Bulgarian history is applicable in the case of Muslim invasion in India as well. Innumerable Holocausts, which have been done by Muslims in India to establish Mugal Dynasty. Holocaust in Kashmir against native Hindu Pandits, Malabar holocaust in one of the south Indian States (Kerala) in 1928 carried out against Hindus by Muslims. How many do you need? The Painter M.F.Hussain (Indian) drew the naked picture of Hindu Goddesses to satisfy his old body. There was no “Hafta” ordered against him by Hindus. Hindu Religion has given him full freedom of expression even to rape our faiths. But remember the fate of Salman Rushdi and Thasleema Nasrin, when they expressed their freedom of views.
So, shut up your preaching about peaceful Islam. It is a VICIOUS, WICKED AND VENOMUS FAITH, only suitable for Dark Age and only idiots can be proud of it. Islamic terrorism is a suitable word to call the jihadi activities.
Agree (42)
Disagree (45)
Recommend (10)
Offensive
June 06,2009 at 08:35 PM IST
When will the human learn to practice their faith more and stop maligning each other religion.People of every religion have committed atrocities on the people of other religion hindus have fought and killed muslims christian and even people of lower caste,muslims have fought and killed christian hindus,christian have killed muslims hindus and people of other religion everybody in the world know it,politics and land grabbing were the main reason its still happening today people of all religion are animal and they will be there till the end of the world, my advice to all the people of all religion is practise your own religion more and talk about it less otherwise abusing and maligning each other religion will not stop and will not end.
Agree (30)
Disagree (32)
Recommend (10)
Offensive
June 07,2009 at 09:06 AM IST
I totally endorse the reply to the muslims/muslim apologists. There might be peace in the Koran, but it is totally against the peace of Non-muslims. Do you think we do not know what it says about idol worshippers, Jews and Christians? Here , living in this Hindu-majority country its easy to shout secularism and ask for not only equality but concession after concession. Yet there is not a single muslim majority country in which Non-muslims are given the same rights as muslims, upto the right of proselytization. There is no religion than Islam that creates a culture of such fear that threatens its adherents with murder should they choose to leave the faith, or should their females marry someone outside their faith. It is meaningless whether there are 1.5 billion or 15 billion muslims..that doesn't make Islam true or ur so called prophet any better. The LTTEs, Naxalites do not kill and then read verses from the Geeta glorifying their deeds. And in any case have some proportion--muslims are/have been engaged in problems/warfare everywhere, against Buddhists (thailand), Chinese (Xinkiang), Russians (Chechnya), Israel, US, UK, France, Netherlands, Phillipines ...don't forget Hindus (don't u dare whitewash ur forefather's brutal history..considering u r and Arab/Turk/Afghan; if u r one of those convertees, shame!!)..moreever, Muslims are killing Muslims more than anyone else (Sudan, Somalia, Afganisthan, Pakistan, Iraq/Kurd, Hamas/PLA, Algeria...list is neverending)..yet u have the cheek to call this religion peaceful???
TOI will publish his if it wants to be impartial.
Agree (43)
Disagree (46)
Recommend (11)
Offensive
June 07,2009 at 09:49 AM IST
Obama is a fool to believe that the Muslims have fallen for what he has said. It is all a pretence. In no time, they will stab him in the back and that will be a lesson for him to learn.
Agree (36)
Disagree (34)
Recommend (10)
Offensive
June 07,2009 at 01:26 PM IST
Dear All,
I am Indian-Muslim and not pseudo-secular, although there was communal riots in india, but I have seen and experience the peaceful and loveable Hindu friends, I know from heart that all these games belongs to political gains, this has been proved for 100's of times.
BJP+RSS group behind Gujarat & other riots and these groups have their own supporters, but i am damn sure that when they see burning houses and bodies they too will shed tears in their own hearts.
coming back to Mr. Obama: He is just a pawn on bigger chess platform of the world there are only two players Muslims & Jews all other are just pieces on the chess board.
Mr. Obama a Pawn and a molded mind that cannot do analysis by his own mind, Imagine the freedom of speech you can say against Jesus Christ by you cannot say against holocaust.
A molded Mind: like a common human being who is packed by universities in carton of doctor/engineer/CA etc.. Mr. Obama is also molded in form of US president who will do what is allowed to him by constitution.
He was very clear in saying that he will save American first... good very good ... then don’t play around with words of love for humanity etc... As he got all right to save American / America all other nations have right save themselves.
Mr. Obama was talking for American interest, he might bombard innocent civilians in any part of the world if it serve’s American interest… so I don’t believe in his speech.
Yesterday USSR was divided into many countries, yesterdays brothers started fighting today, Yugoslavia broken into pieces, each pieces resident start fighting with other piece resident, yesterdays India divided into Pakistan (failed state) and Bangladesh as we are well aware that we have fought wars and still fighting…so instead of talking about a piece of land we shall grow-up as human and think about betterment.
Religion, sects, country, philosophies are tools to manage humans, we shall find out rational tool.
Agree (33)
Disagree (29)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 08,2009 at 03:19 AM IST
Reply to Anil Sharma:
You are just another hater and an educated ignorant person the likes of you are so common in Indian politics and the beaurocratic India.
This is not dark ages or the middle ages where people were killed brutally for power. Majority of the world is governed by democracy and whats impartial and unfair in democracy will always be wrong.
As far as religion is concerned,the basic tenets of Islam, Christianity and Judaism revolve around peace and wellbeing.A positive influence of these religions have given the most amazing and wonderful things to mankind. Its totally wrong and ignorant to think any of these religions were based on killing innocent people.
Its just because of a fraction of extremist christians, muslims , jews and hindus that the world is facing such problems.
I would advise everyone to carefully read the books of God sent to the prophets before making blatant and ignorant comments.
Agree (39)
Disagree (37)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 08,2009 at 12:52 PM IST
dear all,
the problem of "my religion is superior to ur religion" has arisen over ages because we have essentially forgot that any religion is meant for helping ones own self. it forms the core of moral values of individual which inturn decides the actions which one takes in his day to day life. Over a period of time People in power have used it as a tool to safeguard their interests. It is now so intermixed that now whenever we think of religion we don't think of spirituality but rather ugly politics. No religion on this earth teaches poor moral values like crime against others, but to fulfil their narrow gains people use it like . Most of the ordinary people who don't have any truck with this politics fall in line with their religious leaders in the name of GOD. This is exactly why extremists like Taliban have survived. So dear, it is not that any religion is good or bad. ANY religion on earth is good, it is only dirty politics of power which malignes its image. Somehow it is happening more in case of muslims. Worldover, the image goes as if any act of terrorism happens there is more likelihood of of it happening by some organisation which claims it to be upholder of islam. ISLAM can't be and is not a religion which gives them authority to do such crimes. If a person of any other faith says it, it is like pointing finger to the child of ur neighbour and parents(read all muslims) are bound to defend it. So, the onus lies more on people of ones own faith, be it hindu, muslim, jew etc. to first look at ones own shortcomings and cleanse them. It is to be done by the enlightened people of same community. Let us again review the real purpose of religion and what it has to do with politics and power. Let us(masses) not be driven and pulled into fighting to keep somebody in power for whome religion is merely a tool to further his political ambitions. People of Every religion has to do this favour to their own religion, if we as humans want to live in peace on this earth
Agree (29)
Disagree (26)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
June 13,2009 at 10:43 AM IST
Geet Says,
"please follow your Religion".
This has been said twice in Geeta chapter 3, verse 35 and chapter 18, verse 47
Agree (29)
Disagree (27)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
July 04,2009 at 05:33 AM IST
My dear Indrani please accept my greetings. I have to inform you that there is nothing like
"ISLAMIC EXTREMISM". The religion "ISLAM" is a
way of life not only for the muslims but for
every humanbeing on the earth for ultimate peace
and prosperity and thereafter for reward of
heaven. Islam means "PEACE". We cannot term and
call "HINDU TERRORISTS" for the work of demolishing "Babri Masjid" due to frenzy and
crusade of few people. Moreover there is nothing
like "CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS","JEW TERRORISTS",
"SIKH TERRORISTS", "JAIN TERRORISTS" ETC.,
President Barack Husein Obama of America has not
played on the muslim roots of his to convince the
Muslims all over the world. He is a good person
and wants to change the world from the present
economic and political mess. He is a good orator
and when he delivers the speech people hear him with good attention everywhere.
Agree (15)
Disagree (15)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
July 04,2009 at 08:15 AM IST
Islam origins were not peaceful. They used the power of the sword to behead people if they did not convert. Mohammed himself was a phedophile by marrying a 9 year old girl.
Agree (17)
Disagree (18)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
July 04,2009 at 11:57 AM IST
Hi Indrani ,
I would appreciate , if you can remove this blog right away or republish it by removing the word "Islamic" associated with "Extremism" because both are opposite of each other.If you want to learn about ISLAM just do google and you will find your way to life and hereafter.
If you want to continue , you can.But it states you as an extremist in simple words.
Regarding TOI or Times Of India , I dont think this news is any more genunine enough because i have monitored this news from last 10 years and I have seen it Anti-Muslim , Anti-Islamic heart and mind from the beginning.
No Thanks & No Regards to Jealot ,
AliofNYC.
Agree (15)
Disagree (15)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
July 04,2009 at 12:13 PM IST
This is the same Obama who cried racism when anyone even mentioned his middle name (Hussien) during the election. Then he was no muslim, he was a devout Christian, so devout that he stuck with racist black preachers.
Any muslim who believes in Obama's words is a fool indeed. just ask America's gay community. he opposed gay marriage during the primaries, then he promised all kinds of stuff during the general election, and once elected he talks the talk but siots out the walk.
He will say anything that any audience wants to hear. In the end, when the US economy continues to splutter into 2011, he will commit genocide in Afghanistan and bomb Iran to win re-election.
Agree (18)
Disagree (13)
Recommend (9)
Offensive
July 31,2009 at 12:30 PM IST
We all need to learn to TOLERATE and LEARN to live PEACEFULLY with one another for the sake of the CHILDREN
Agree (11)
Disagree (10)
Recommend (9)
Offensive